"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
05/20/2014 at 12:27 • Filed to: None
4
4|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
05/20/2014 at 12:27 • Filed to: None | 4
| 4 |
the Studebaker Commander was a pretty good-looking car.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/20/2014 at 12:37 |
|
I must protest. Your post seems to imply a Studebaker Commander with the best available nose is contained in it.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
05/20/2014 at 12:44 |
|
I prefer that later one (above) but that one with…whatever they call that nose (Bullet nose? Rocket nose? Nipple Nose?) is pretty cool too.
lone_liberal
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/20/2014 at 12:49 |
|
Yes, yes it was. Definitely underrated.
BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/20/2014 at 13:31 |
|
I wonder what that would look like debumpered. Pretty good I wager.
Actually, I'm a little undecided on the whole pro-touring thing. It seems to vary greatly between applications, but I think the Commander would make a great candidate.